Investigated baseline
Time / part
65.1 min
Cost / part
$43.81
Published production-scale case
In the validated flange case, simulation-guided parameters reduced deposition time and the direct variable cost of material, shielding gas and electrical energy—without separating process economics from manufacturing quality.
machine time difference per year
annual variable-cost difference
Investigated baseline
Time / part
65.1 min
Cost / part
$43.81
Digital-twin optimized
ValidatedTime / part
18.5 min
Cost / part
$15.58
Based on 2,400 flanges per year. The dominant saving in this case came from reduced shielding-gas time, with electrical energy also contributing. These figures describe this published validation case—not a universal guarantee or full TCO calculation.
See how our physics-based simulations predict outcomes and optimize process parameters before production.

Precisely tune laser power, feed rate, and robot motion to achieve consistent, high-quality deposition.
Instantly detect process defects and eliminate trial-and-error — all driven by a high-fidelity digital twin.
Powered by:
Baal Hammon MultiPhysicsOur SPH based Multi Physics Deposition Solver
Simulation and Optimization for Wire Laser Additive Manufacturing.
Find the Perfect Process Settings
Analyze multiple parameter combinations. Eliminate guesswork, reduce material waste, and maximize build quality for your metal additive manufacturing process.
Simulate, Predict, Perfect
Layer-by-layer simulations of your metal AM process give you accurate insights into melt pools, heat flow, and material behavior — so you can print with confidence.
Find Stable Parameters, Every Time
Detect optimal process windows to ensure consistent part quality, prevent defects, and guarantee build integrity.
Tell us about the production challenge, robot cell or additive process you want to optimize.